8 Common misconceptions about GPS Fleet Tracking

The normal objections to applying GPS tracking capacities in a fleet are based on acceptable assumptions — but, the real experience users experienced with this technology explains to a much different, and much more encouraging, story. Each “myth” here is followed by a reply based on real user experience, pulling from data that Navtrak, a GPS services service provider, and impartial third-party research accumulated.

  • Misconception 1. We don’t need GPS monitoring because we trust our people.

    GPS monitoring is not about monitoring employees’ every move. It’s about minimizing operating costs and inefficiencies in the field. GPS monitoring systems have which can reduce gasoline and maintenance costs, increase routing and dispatching efficiency, provide security and safety for individuals, and increase response acceleration and precision to customer questions.

  • Misconception 2. All our motorists will stop if we get GPS traffic monitoring.

    Experience with a large number of customers contradicts this notion. Actually, once field employees gain experience with GPS traffic monitoring, they rely upon it for routing information, roadside assistance, confirmation of work performed promptly, etc. Oftentimes, GPS tracking gets rid of time-consuming paperwork and additional security for both motorists and cargo while on the highway.

    “Our men have adapted perfectly to the machine. We didn’t have anybody leave, and today the motorists are needs to realize the great things about the system on their behalf,” said Clay Phillips, leader, Ross & Witmer HVAC, Charlotte, N.C.

  • Misconception 3. GPS monitoring systems are complicated to set up and use.

    Most fleet monitoring systems consist of the same basic components: a GPS recipient installed in each vehicle and a interface that organizes and shows collected information. Both unit installation and use of the systems are simple.
    An established, experienced GPS traffic monitoring vendor works together with fleet professionals to:

    • Put into practice the fleet management solution as seamlessly as you possibly can.
    • Interpret system data and put it on enhance the functional efficiencies.
    • Provide experienced, accessible specialized and sales support to protect service issues.

  • Misconception 4. GPS monitoring is unnecessary.

    I can observe my fleet sufficiently using cell devices/handhelds. Though useful as communication tools, cell cell phones/handhelds cannot provide information beneficial to fleet professionals: real-time vehicle location, engine motor status, record of puts a stop to and stop times, and other valuable metrics, such as mileage, gasoline intake, or speeding habits. Mobile phones and handhelds can be switched off easily, not taken in the automobile, lowered/damaged, etc. Even though mobile phones are functioning appropriately, they keep tabs on people alternatively than mobile belongings.

    “With portable GPS mobile phones, we were not able to observe vehicles. We’d some circumstances where employees would simply just turn the cell phones off. If the telephone is switched off, you can’t keep track of the trucks. The machine becomes totally inadequate,” said John Boucher, founder & owner, Boucher PROPERTY Co., Woonsocket, R.I.

  • Misconception 5. All GPS traffic monitoring systems are essentially identical.

    “When you can inform me where all my vehicles are in at any time and can provide me information about their day to day activities, that’s sufficient for me personally.” That demand appears affordable enough on the top, however the business-enhancing probable of GPS systems for fleet management should go well beyond monitoring dots over a map. Most GPS traffic monitoring service users realize the entire impact of the obtained information only after regular use. Many providers simply create basic GPS traffic monitoring features, but don’t invest in supporting customers leverage this powerful technology to change just how they conduct business. When analyzing GPS traffic monitoring providers, regulate how much interest each shows in studying the customer’s business and specific requirements and goals. This myth will does indeed contain an aspect of fact, however. Technology is not the main criterion in choosing a GPS monitoring company. Experienced users know the partnership with the supplier during the period of the service agreement is where value truly is situated.

    “We began using the technology about five years back, but quickly became miserable with the machine we’d purchased. After we had got it, we had to keep everything. It became clear that people needed a far more capable and complex GPS spouse,” said John Doyle, director of technology & marketing communications, Alure Home Advancements, Inc., Plainvew, N.Y.

  • Misconception 6. A GPS monitoring system is another product I could buy to help with making my business more profitable.

    GPS tracking shouldn’t be seen as a product. Alternatively, it is something to which a fleet subscribes — something that gives information a fleet administrator lacks the methods to gather, but helps improve the company’s overall production and profitability.
    All GPS traffic monitoring suppliers ask customers to signal a service contract, typically for 3 to 4 years. Therefore the question is which supplier will the fleet administrator trust to help take care of the business’s mobile resources for another many years? Service is the key factor as it pertains to effective GPS fleet traffic monitoring.

  • Misconception 7. My company can’t find the money for a GPS traffic monitoring system.

    Cost can be an understandable matter. GPS monitoring systems typically require an investment in hardware for each and every vehicle and a every month cost for data and cordless services. However, these systems discovered inefficiencies and methods in the field that already cost companies hundreds, or even thousands on a monthly basis: unnecessary overtime, inefficient routing, aspect trips, excess engine unit idling, reckless traveling, etc. The expense of these inefficiencies often surpasses the every month investment necessary for a GPS monitoring service. Most fleet achieve a profits on return within the first couple of months of using the machine, due to cost savings in overtime costs, gas expenditures, lower insurance costs, reduced vehicle maintenance, and even more.

  • Misconception 8. GPS monitoring can be an unproven technology.

    GPS technology itself (the capability to locate and trail objects anytime and in real-time using satellites and cellular marketing communications) has been used effectively for many years. The central technology is currently prevalent throughout the buyer market with such popular makes as Garmin and TomTom.

In commercial applications, GPS systems’ efficiency in increasing efficiency and reducing functional costs has been well-documented by reputable third-party options.